Dairy farmer takes Panera to task

2013-07-31T04:00:00Z 2013-08-06T23:12:30Z Dairy farmer takes Panera to taskBy STU ELLIS - For the Herald & Review Herald-Review.com

Agriculture has suffered from some bad public relations in recent times.

Part of the reason is the lack of a coordinated effort to identify the negative issue and launch a campaign to counter it. About five dozen farm organizations have attempted to do that and identified four young, presentable farm folks to visit with metropolitan media, use social media, and speak to consumer groups about the positives of agriculture.

They should have picked Carrie Mess, a Wisconsin dairy farmer. Using the Twitter name @Dairy

Carrie, she took on a nasty marketing initiative by the Panera Bread Co. and has essentially won a contemporary David versus Goliath battle.

Her personal website, www.dairycarrie.com, begins with the story on July 23, indicating Panera Bread Co. has lost a customer. She had gone there to eat, looked at the menu and noted that one of the chicken selections was for “all natural, antibiotic-free chicken.”

Knowing that all chicken must meet USDA standards for withholding antibiotics prior to processing, she visited the Panera website and was appalled.

Panera had a cartoon chicken, called EZ Chicken, made to look like a medicine capsule, telling readers that it was raised on antibiotics because “It’s just … easier.” The Panera animation indicates “Hard work pays off eventually, but lazy pays off now.”

Carrie’s blog says, “Panera isn’t calling all farmers and ranchers lazy! They are just calling the ones that use antibiotics lazy! I used antibiotics to help a sick calf get better last week, my friends the organic farmers had a cow with pneumonia and they gave that cow antibiotics to make her better. They had to sell her, but she lived. Does that mean we are lazy? Is it lazy to take care of our sick animals?”

Carrie created what is known as “Internet buzz.” The impact was an 8 percent decline in Panera corporate stock value, about $20.

The next thing she knew was that Panera’s Chief Marketing Officer was calling her. She got his attention, and her blog was updated with the conversation.

The Panera executive said it was not a campaign to offend farmers, but Carrie said the problem was that the ad campaign used fear to sell sandwiches. He told her that he does not understand all of the facts behind animal agriculture production.

He told Carrie that Panera would take down the images and references to EZ Chicken, and she said he should also take down the barnlike structure made out of red and white pill capsules.

When Carrie additionally asked for an apology, Panera said it would post something on Facebook that “clarified their viewpoint.”

She replied, “Taking down a few images that infer that farmers are lazy doesn’t fix that. A company that uses fear in their marketing is a company that doesn’t want my business … I don’t care how expensive their chicken is.”

And she added, “Join me in telling Panera Bread Co. that this is not OK. Tweet and Facebook with the hashtag #PluckEZChicken, tell Panera what you think.”

Here is a young lady that is proud of agriculture and the world around her and took issue with a corporate advertising campaign that used the wrong images and the wrong message and has been spanked in a way that stung where it was noticed — in the company’s stock value.

All Panera had to do was ask some of their chicken suppliers how they would perceive the campaign. That would have saved millions of dollars in the corporate bottom line, which was wasted while the stock value declined.

Thumbs up, Dairy Carrie. Thumbs down, Panera.

Stu Ellis is an observer of the Central Illinois agriculture scene. Keep up with him during the week on his blog, which can be found at www.herald-review.com/blogs/stuellis/

Copyright 2015 Herald-Review.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. cleaver
    Report Abuse
    cleaver - August 08, 2013 11:54 am
    DairyCarrie: The Farmers that are using the antibiotics on a regular basis are not necessary lazy but are more for profit. They are called Factory Farmed They use less labor, means less cost, and keep their chickens caged up so they have complete control of them and have more chickens which means more dollars in their pocket. They are called Factory farmed chickens living in close quarters or cages. Some are more humane then others but still they still use antibiotics trying to keep them healthy due to the close quarters they are forced to live in. "These chickens spend their lives in warehouse-like sheds, stocked in such high-densities that they are denied many important natural behaviors, such as the abilities to nest, roost, or ever flap their wings." "These sheds, called "grower houses", confine up to 20,000 chickens at a density or approximately 130 square inches per bird. Grower houses are usually windowless, with temperatures controlled through forced-ventilation. Barren except for sparse amounts of litter material on the floors and rows of feeders and drinkers, these sheds provide environments that only frustrate broiler chickens, decreasing their welfare and depriving them of natural inclinations. Many chickens will die from disease and stress related to these overcrowded conditions, however, profit margins encourage the continued use of grower houses." I would have no problem eating Panera chicken sandwich's, Just go to your google search screen and type in Factory farmed chickens , and you will find a lot of information re: these type of chickens, beef and hogs as well
  2. AndyVance
    Report Abuse
    AndyVance - August 06, 2013 6:10 pm
    Stu, I don't want to be contrary, but one thing you mentioned is wholly inaccurate: You wrote, "Carrie created what is known as 'internet buzz.' The impact was an 8 percent decline in Panera corporate stock value, about $20."

    Actually, Panera reported its quarterly earnings on July 23, which precipitated the sharp selloff in the company's stock. Analysts were particularly disappointed with comparable-store sales. Sales at company-owned stores open more than one year were up just 3.8% in the quarter, certainly a disappointing number for a stock priced at 27 times earnings (which were still up 16% for the quarter, btw).

    That's not to take anything away from Dairy Carrie's advocacy efforts, but correlating her blog with Panera's stock price is woefully off-base.
  3. DairyCarrie
    Report Abuse
    DairyCarrie - August 02, 2013 12:31 am
    Thank you for your kind words and your support Stu! I am absolutely energized by the amazing response this issue has received from the ag community!
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

More Businesses
Activate subscription button gif
loading...

Deals & Offers

More Offers