Skip to main contentSkip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.

WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING: Mixed messaging, reluctant leaders aren’t helping battle

  • 0
Virus Outbreak

McKenzie Farias, 8, holds the hand of her father, Michael, as she receives the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 5-11 at a state-run site  Nov. 4, 2021, in Cranston, R.I.

The omicron surge couldn’t have come at a worse time.

After two years of things like mask-wearing, fights over mask-wearing and constant risk calculation over mask-wearing, people are exhausted and more divided than ever. Add in a healthy dose of mixed messaging and conflicting information, and we’ve got a real problem on our hands.

Mixed signals are nothing new, leading to confusion and mistrust about what guidance to follow. Should you get tested before ending your isolation? Are at-home tests even reliable? How careful does one need to be, really?

The blame can, in part, be attributed to the federal government, namely the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, whose constant flip-flopping has spurred a crisis of credibility. The CDC’s own advice, as well as that of the president, is often at odds with what public health experts and doctors recommend. The American Medical Association, the nation’s largest association of physicians, criticized the CDC’s updated isolation and quarantine guidance, saying it risks further spread of the virus.

Still, conflicting information is only partially to blame for the crisis at hand. Instead of getting tougher on COVID, we sometimes appear to be giving up.

At colleges and universities, for instance, transmission among students and instructors is seen as something to be expected rather than prevented. In-person operations at public universities began this week with few restrictions, despite dire predictions from epidemiologists.

Even the White House seems to have had enough.

“For the unvaccinated, you’re looking at a winter of severe illness and death for yourselves, your families and the hospitals you may soon overwhelm,” White House COVID coordinator Jeff Zients said at a December press briefing.

State and local government officials have adopted a similar strategy of shrug and surrender as they attempt to balance public health and politics, too often erring on the side of the latter. There’s not much political or economic appetite for COVID restrictions anymore — politicians have vowed to keep schools open and avoid further shutdowns. 

“This is not March 2020,” they say. And in some ways, that’s true. We have vaccines now and omicron appears to be milder, thankfully, at least among those who are vaccinated. Nonetheless, our pseudo-surrender does come with a price. As cases are surging, hospital staffs are pushed beyond their limits. Our lives are disrupted anyway, not out of precaution, but out of necessity. Flights are being canceled, surgeries rescheduled, schools closed, because there simply aren’t enough healthy people to keep things running smoothly.

We seem determined to let omicron run its course, but as the virus burns through the population, what carnage is it leaving behind? More deaths. Sick children. Vaccinated people who are now saddled with long-term illness and disability. But if we can’t rely on our institutions for protection — or even reliable information — the virus itself may be the least of our worries.

The Charlotte Observer 




Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News